French Connection II kept the train going a little longer. After the success of The Godfather Part II, a sequel to Best Picture winner The French Connection seemed like a good idea. Even though I never heard of it beforehand. It’s a strong follow up, but it does take away from the ambiguity of the first film’s ending. New York police officer Popeye Doyle never caught his French assailant Alain Charnier.
French Connection II continues the chase and gives Gene Hackman more time to shine in his Oscar winning role. Directing reigns were handed over to John Frankenheimer, while Roy Schneider was too busy making Jaws. Popeye is now all by himself in Marseille, France. He deals with the language barrier, has trouble ordering drinks, fails to pick up French women, and can’t carry a gun. All while attempting to work with the French police department in order to catch his Frog.
Fernando Rey is the only other returning cast member. Charnier is still a sophisticated drug trafficker who proves increasingly difficult to catch. The pacing is a lot slower with more time dedicated to Popeye being forced into a heroin addiction. It’s only after he gets clean that Popeye becomes the violent cop in desperate pursuit again. The sequel ends with a decent chase from the streets to a rail bus. Popeye loses Charnier once more on a yacht, but I knew they wouldn’t end another movie without a resolution. French Connection II offers closure to an already perfect crime thriller.
Popeye Doyle gives chase
Preceded by: The French Connection
Master Mix Movies 
Right. They broke it in order to fix it. Same with Rocky. The ambiguity of the ending is the summation of the film and the character Popeye Doyle. I was intrigued by the kidnapping and forced heroine addiction, though. Brutal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rocky II is exactly what I thought when I watched it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Doesn’t hold a candle to the original, but still a fun ride.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly how I felt.
LikeLike
More like an epilogue than a real sequel. While not as good as the first film, I did think that it was well-done and interesting. And I would argue that Hackman is even better the second time around. I also loved the ending — a fine conclusion to the saga.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can’t argue with that. It did feel necessary for those who wanted a conclusion.
LikeLiked by 1 person