The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes is the inevitable prequel of a once successful franchise. Lionsgate wanted to make spin-offs, but Suzanne Collins gave them inspiration when she wrote The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes. Despite only coming out in 2020, the movie was released 3 years later. I wasn’t exactly excited after the lackluster finale Mockingjay – Part 1 & 2, but I was willing to return to Panem. I’m just glad returning director Francis Lawrence didn’t split the prequel in parts like The Hobbit or Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. Even if it does make The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes an overly long 2 hours & 38 minutes. It is however split in parts that feel like separate movies. The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes takes place 64 years in the past during the 10th Hunger Games. Series villain President Coriolanus Snow is controversially the protagonist. Unlike Anakin Skywalker becoming Darth Vader, Snow’s moments of evil feel more random than earned.
Newcomer Tom Blyth still feels worthy of Donald Sutherland’s role. Coryo is the son of a Capitol war hero living in poor conditions with his cousin Tigris and Grandma’am. The transgender Hunter Schafer is Coryo’s voice of reason and Fionnula Flanagan expects a lot from the family. Part 1: The Mentor reveals the 10th Hunger Games to be the first time mentors were implemented to make the show more entertaining. Turns out Snow fell in love with a girl from District 12 long before he met Katniss Everdeen. Unlike Katniss, Lucy Gray Baird is more of a lover than a fighter. The far less likable Rachel Zegler is essentially a coal miner’s daughter from a traveling group called Covey. Zegler’s singing is put to good use with songs like a new rendition of “The Hanging Tree.” Lucy Gray stands out with her colorful dress and defiance. Fellow West Side Story co-star Josh Andrรฉs Rivera is also defiant as mentor friend of Coryo, Sejanus Plinth. Respected cast members with silly character names include Viola Davis, Peter Dinklage, and Jason Schwartzman.
Davis hams it up as sadistic gamemaker Dr. Volumnia Gaul. Dinklage is more reserved as original game creator Dean Casca Highbottom. Schwartzman is the sole comic relief TV host Lucky Flickerman who channels Stanley Tucci. Part 2: The Prize is more interesting since it focuses on a primitive version of the Hunger Games. They fight in a small Capitol arena that’s ruined in a rebel bombing. Regardless of how many Tributes stand out, it’s still uncomfortable to see their fates play out. Coryo falls for Lucy Gray and helps her cheat by directly interfering in the games. If Lucy Gray is the songbird, then rainbow colored muttation snakes fulfill the rest of the title. Part 3: The Peacekeeper can’t live up to what already felt like a climax. Snow is forced to work as a peacekeeper under Burn Gorman’s ruthless Commander Hoff. The District 12 romance between Coryo and Lucy Gray feels natural until he ruins it by accepting who he is. The ending makes sense if you’ve seen The Hunger Games, but it is disappointing as a standalone conclusion. The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes is better when the Hunger Games are a focal point.
![The Hunger Games The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes](https://mastermixmovies.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hunger-games-ht-ml-230428_1682687010471_hpmain_16x9_1600.jpg)
Coriolanus Snow protects Lucy Gray Baird
Followed by: The Hunger Games
I actually enjoy this. I was hoping for an Anakin Skywalker turns to the dark side moment. And I guess we kind of got it. Kind of.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could’ve used some work on that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My wife and I saw the first Hunger Games and thought it was ok, but we were never motivated enough to see the sequels. When I saw the trailer for this prequel, I did wonder if one would need to have seen all of the Hunger Games franchise in order to enjoy this, or just the original.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The sequels aren’t completely necessary for the prequel, but the sequels are acknowledged in ways that will affect how you see it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I personally really liked this movie. I actually did read the book before watching the movie, so I knew what to expect from it. Thus, I was mostly pleased with what the film had to offer. Perhaps my biggest gripe with the narrative (both book and movie) was that the middle portion was frontloaded with all the action and exciting moments, while the third act slowed to a crawl. The movie shortens this portion of the story, but it still stalls a bit more than it should be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess that’s just a fundamental flaw then.
LikeLike
Never had an interest in the Hunger Games books or films, but I understand their appeal to an extent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It wasn’t really revitalized by this prequel.
LikeLiked by 1 person